Benchmarking data published

2 Feb 2026

The following dataset has been published on the National Clinical Audit Benchmarking (NCAB) website, HQIP’s online portal which provides access to national audit performance data.

NCAB is an online portal, hosted by HQIP, which provides access to national audit performance data. Users do not need to register, and can access audit benchmarked data searchable by speciality, Trust, hospital or unit. For all datasets currently published, go to the NCAB site.

NHS England Clinical audits and registries guide published

2 Feb 2026

This week, NHS England published Clinical audits and registries: A best practice guide, which is aimed at both owners and administrators of new and existing health care audits and registries, including NHS England.

This guidance sets out a unified approach for commissioning and overseeing clinical audits and registries across the NHS in England, and within the audit and registry community. Its objectives are to “support audits and registries owners and commissioners to work in partnership with NHS England”, and act as a “reference tool for those participating in the process”. More specifically, it states that “its primary aim is to ensure systems deliver timely, actionable insights that support clinical decision-making, enhance patient safety, improve healthcare quality and reduce inequalities in access and outcomes.”

The guide sets out the sources of clinical audits and registries that NHS England supports, and this includes the National Clinical Audits and Patient Outcomes Programme (NCAPOP), as one of “those clinical audits that are directly or indirectly funded and commissioned by NHS England’s Medical Directorate via the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP)”. It outlines the key considerations for the NCAPOP and other NHS England-commissioned sources, namely:

  • Compliance with NHS England’s statutory responsibilities
  • Joined-up approach to clinical leadership and governance
  • Appropriate data use and analysis
  • Data and analytics infrastructure to streamline information governance
  • Clarify responsibilities for ensuring detection of unwarranted variation and outliers
  • Clear process for commissioning and decommissioning audits and registries.

In relation to defining and managing outliers, this guide cites HQIP’s Outlier management for national clinical audits as an example that “sets out the definition and statistical process used to identify alarms and alerts. It includes the need to identify positive outliers to celebrate clinical excellence and include non-participation as an outlier flag.” It also mentions the HQIP-hosted National Joint Registry (NJR) as an example that “adopts a more intensive ‘accountability and transparency’ model.”

The guide recognises that clinical audits and registries are a key part of a wider NHS quality management system and how they support quality improvement (QI), and includes many HQIP-commissioned programmes as examples:

This document goes on to outline the roles and responsibilities for frontline clinicians and managers, healthcare providers, regional commissioners and ICBs, and NHS England. It also sets standards for working in partnership with others across the sector, including patients, parents, carers and the public, who should be involved in the “design, implementation and evaluation of clinical audits and registries”.

While the guide states that it “does not set out the future direction for audits and registries or how commitments arising from the 10 Year Health Plan and the Dash Review of Patient Safety across the Health and Care landscape will be implemented”, it does say that it is “aligned to the aims of both the 10 Year Health Plan and Quality Strategy”.

Read the guide in full: www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/clinical-audits-registries-best-practice-guide

Notes: 1) While focused on England, the guide acknowledges the cross-border relevance of many audits and registries, including those involving Wales, other devolved nations, crown dependencies and international collaborations. 2) It is a dynamic working document which may be amended to align with evolving needs and the new quality strategy. The guide will be regularly reviewed and updated by NHS England in partnership with colleagues from the audits and registries community.

Further resources from HQIP

  • Discover more about how HQIP supports organisations to use clinical audit and healthcare data to drive improvement – from strategy development to implementation or training
  • Guidance and other resources to support improvement
  • Reports and infographics
  • Benchmarked results, searchable by project name, trust, hospital or unit

Integrating clinical audit and quality improvement to deliver impact for patients

1 Feb 2026

HQIP Associate Director, Dr Iain Smith, features in BMJ Leader Blog this month, on the subject of integrating clinical audit and quality improvement to deliver impact for patients…

Fit-for-the-Future, the ten-year plan for the English NHS, envisages a focus on quality and improvement driven by data.1 The plan acknowledges the wealth of data available nationally – including through clinical audits.1 Furthermore, new best practice guidance from NHS England argues for clinical audit contributing to a wider quality management approach.2

Historically, clinical audit is one of the main mechanisms for improvement in healthcare and is closely associated with quality assurance. More recently, approaches to quality improvement have been adopted into healthcare from other industries focussing on small-scale tests of change and learning – typically with measurement as a key element.3 Whilst tensions between clinical audit and other quality improvement approaches have been observed, both can work in synergy and clinical audit can play a key role in moving towards more systematic data driven quality management.2 4

Background: Clinical Audit and Quality Management

Continuous improvement is a long pursued goal in healthcare.5 A long standing approach to improvement is clinical audit.  Clinical audit involves assessing services against evidence-based criteria and is considered the foundation of a well-functioning healthcare system. It is a cyclical approach that provides feedback upon which action can be taking on areas for improvement before re-auditing to assess the impact (see Figure 1 below).2 6 7

Improvement efforts are more impactful when part of a systematic approach.8 9 Quality management systems (QMS) are a means of systematically improving healthcare and embedding continuous improvement. A QMS combines a systematic approach to quality improvement (QI) with quality planning and quality control.9-11 Quality planning refers to how an organisation or system identifies its priorities for improvement and designs interventions to deliver them.10 Quality planning ensures close alignment of improvement activity with the strategic objectives of the organisation or system.10 11 Quality control refers to measurement of processes to monitor performance in real time and taking action to deliver results in line with performance standards.10 11 In addition to these three core components of a QMS, in healthcare a fourth component is included. Quality assurance focuses on checking whether a service is meeting required standards based on external requirements.9 11 Clinical audit can play a key role across such systematic approaches.12

Figure 1 – The Clinical Audit Cycle (HQIP 2020, used with permission)

Clinical Audit and Quality Planning: Identifying opportunities for improvement

Clinical audit can support progress on national healthcare priorities by considering findings in planning activities. Clinical audit can contribute insights to service planning and commissioning processes by providing both cross-sectional benchmarking and longitudinal data.1 2 The national clinical audit and outcomes programme (NCAPOP) is one of the largest national audit programmes of its kind and can play a major role in the planning process and identification of improvement priorities.12 If healthcare priorities are to be evidence-based, clinically credible and focused on what matters most to patients, this data should shape how services are designed and inform which improvement priorities are selected. For example, the national mothers and babies audit (MBRRACE-UK) identified persistent inequalities in maternal and perinatal outcomes linked to ethnicity, deprivation, and geography. These findings enabled providers, commissioners and national bodies to prioritise targeted improvement efforts focussing attention on highest risk groups.13 14

Clinical Audit and Quality Improvement: Improving patient care and outcomes

Clinical audit is a quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes. A long-standing approach that has stood the test of time, clinical audit can continue to play a leading role in improving processes and outcomes nationally and locally. Through assessment against evidence-based standards for the structure, processes and outcomes of care, changes can be implemented where indicated and monitored to confirm improvement.7 Clinical audit also works alongside other popular approaches to QI – such as Lean and the Model-for-Improvement. These approaches support experimentation and testing in the ‘implementing change’ stage of the audit cycle.4 Therefore, if we want improvement that is data-driven, evidence-informed and clinically trusted, clinical audit should be central to any systematic QI approach. For example, the fragility fracture and falls audit programme (FFFAP) provides the national audit of inpatient falls (NAIF) which has seen improvements in its key indicators over the past six years. NAIF also provides resources to support local quality improvement projects.15

Clinical Audit and Quality Control: Ongoing measurement of quality

Clinical audit supports quality control processes by providing evidence of impact of changes introduced. In improvement work, to assess tests of change, a family of metrics is used comprising process and outcome measures.3 Audit is ideally placed to contribute to this and help improvement efforts to know whether changes lead to improvement. Whilst audits have been carried out previously at distal points in time, such as annually, there are examples of audits operating more frequently. With increasing focus on digital technologies, further shifts towards real-time audit are anticipated.1 For example, the paediatric intensive care audit network (PICANet) provides continuous, risk-adjusted monitoring of outcomes, allowing providers and national bodies to track trends in mortality, detect variation and identify emerging quality concerns.16

Clinical Audit and Quality Assurance: Evidence based compliance with standards

Quality assurance processes help organisations to understand care quality through periodic checks that particular standards are being achieved and addressing identified shortfalls.2 11 Alongside inspection and accreditation, clinical audit is one of the main quality assurance mechanisms used by healthcare organisations.4 11 Clinical audit is effective for providing assurance of compliance with evidence-based standards – including national standards via national audits.

Clinical audit is one of the earliest forms of QI in healthcare. Whilst typically associated with quality assurance, clinical audit can play a key role across all quality management domains including planning, control and improvement. To provide confidence that care is consistently safe, effective and improving over time, clinical audit should underpin how we improve and monitor for proactive oversight and quality control.”

This article was published as a blog on BMJ Leader on 9th Feb 2026: Quality management and clinical audit: Integrating clinical audit and quality improvement to deliver impact for patients. By Iain Smith – The official blog of BMJ Leader

Further resources from HQIP

  • Discover more about how HQIP supports organisations to use clinical audit and healthcare data to drive improvement – from strategy development to implementation or training
  • Guidance and other resources to support improvement
  • Reports and infographics
  • Benchmarked results, searchable by project name, trust, hospital or unit

References

  1. Department of Health & Social Care and NHS England. Fit for the future: 10 Year Health Plan for England. London: UK Government, 2025.
  2. NHS England. Clinical audits and registries: A best practice guide. London: NHS England (Available at https://future.nhs.uk ), 2026.
  3. Shah A. Using data for improvement. BMJ 2019;364:l189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l189
  4. Backhouse A, Ogunlayi F. Quality improvement into practice. BMJ 2020;368:m865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m865
  5. Berwick D. Continuous Improvement as an Ideal in Healthcare. New Engl J Med 1989;320(1):53-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198901053200110
  6. Ivers N, Foy R. Audit, Feedback, and Behaviour Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.
  7. HQIP. Best practice in clinical audit. London: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Available at www.hqip.org.uk ), 2020.
  8. Dixon-Woods M, Martin GP. Does quality improvement improve quality? Future Hospital Journal 2016;3(3):191-94. doi: https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.3-3-191
  9. Spela Godec MH, John Illingworth, Carl Macrae. Developing whole-organisation Quality Management Systems in health care: learning from practice and recommendations for progress. London: The Health Foundation, 2025.
  10. Glassborow R. Moving from Quality Improvement to Quality Management: Supporting better quality health and social care for everyone in Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: Healthcare Improvement Scotland (Available at www.ihub.scot ), 2022.
  11. Shah A. How to move beyond quality improvement projects. BMJ 2020;370:m2319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2319
  12. Clark CI. Healthcare data: The key to improvement and efficiency [Blog]. London: BMJ Leader; 2025 [updated 03 Dec 2025. Available from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmjleader/2025/12/03/healthcare-data-the-key-to-improvement-and-efficiency-by-dame-celia-ingham-clark accessed 19 Jan 2026 2026.
  13. MBRRACE-UK. Maternal mortality 2022-2024 Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2026 [updated 15 Jan 202627 Jan 2026]. Available from: https://www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/data-brief/maternal-mortality-2022-2024.
  14. NHS England. The Maternal Care Bundle: A care bundle for reducing maternal mortality and morbidity London: NHS England; 2026 [updated 16 Jan 2026. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/the-maternal-care-bundle/ accessed 26 Jan 2026.
  15. National Audit of Inpatient Falls (NAIF). Stepping towards improvement: an analysis of 2024 inpatient falls audit data and reflection on 6 years as continuous audit. London: Royal College of Physicians (Available at https://www.rcp.ac.uk/86396 ), 2025.
  16. Universities of Leeds and Leicester. The Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet): PICANet; 2026 [Available from: https://www.picanet.org.uk accessed 27 Jan 2026.

Latest news: January 2026 eBulletin

29 Jan 2026

The January edition of HQIP’s eBulletin is out now! It features the latest news and updates relating to clinical audit, outcome reviews and data-informed healthcare improvement, including: What’s new?
  • Clinical Audit Awareness Week, 22-26 June 2026
  • HQIP audit drives earlier lung cancer diagnosis
  • NHS England Quality Accounts List 2026-27
  • Benchmarking data published.

A chance to revisit:

  • Latest reports and data
  • Article: Why clinical audit is key to improvement and efficiency.
In other news:
  • Tender opportunities: National audit programmes
  • Elaine Young to retire as NJR Director of Operations – final chance to apply for the role
  • NATCAN Annual Report 2025
  • CVDPREVENT data release
  • Launch of the 2026 National Comparative Audit of Prophylactic Anti-D in Pregnancy
  • FFFAP clinical lead opportunities.
Read HQIP’s latest eBulletin here.
Don’t forget to sign up: Keep up to date with our latest news, events and work programmes by subscribing to our mailing list today. You can also follow us on: LinkedIn and X: @HQIP

Clinical Audit Awareness Week, 22-26 June 2026

29 Jan 2026

Improving lives with healthcare data. 

Clinical Audit Awareness Week aims to improve and save lives by promoting and celebrating the critical role of clinical audit and data-driven healthcare improvement.

Back for 2026, this campaign will run across five themed days, combining new themes with many valued activities from previous years. It will explore how insight becomes action, showcasing practical examples, innovation, and collaboration to support improvement across healthcare. The five themed days include:

  • Turning Strategy into Reality
  • Patient Involvement and Care Equity: Improved Outcomes for All
  • Shaping the Future Together: Innovation and Transformation
  • Patient Safety: Using Data and Audit to Reduce Harm
  • Data-Informed Improvement: From Insight to Impact.

The 2026 campaign will feature NQICAN lunch and learns, engaging events, and awards recognising excellence in clinical audit and data-informed improvement.

Chris Gush, HQIP Chief Executive, said: “Clinical audits, registries, and data-driven improvement are essential to advancing healthcare quality and patient safety. Clinical Audit Awareness Week 2026 will proudly highlight their impact, showcase success stories, and promote a culture of transparency and learning. We encourage organisations, clinicians and teams to get involved, share their work, and celebrate audit to help drive continuous improvement in patient care and outcomes.”

Further information about the themes can be found on our website.

Excellence in Clinical Audit Awards: Opening 16 March

New for 2026, reflecting the professionalism, impact, and high standards demonstrated by recipients, the Clinical Audit Heroes Awards are being renamed the Excellence in Clinical Audit Awards.

The awards will link to the #CAAW26 daily themes and will also continue to include two additional Commendations: Using Data from the NCAPOP and Communicating for Impact.

Entries open 16 March and close 17 April. Full category details and criteria will be shared at the end of February.

Stay up to date

Receive more information about award categories coming at the end of February via our regular communications channels:

  • Newsletter updates: Make sure you are subscribed to HQIP’s monthly eBulletins, where you’ll hear first what’s new.
  • Social media: Follow HQIP on LinkedIn, BlueSky and X for regular campaign updates, using #CAAW26. Please tag HQIP and #CAAW26 to share your activities with us too.
  • HQIP website: Keep checking back on HQIP’s website for the latest updates, activities, and ways to get involved.

Benchmarking data published

27 Jan 2026

The following datasets have been published on the National Clinical Audit Benchmarking (NCAB) website, HQIP’s online portal which provides access to national audit performance data.

NCAB is an online portal, hosted by HQIP, which provides access to national audit performance data. Users do not need to register, and can access audit benchmarked data searchable by speciality, Trust, hospital or unit. For all datasets currently published, go to the NCAB site.

NHS England Quality Accounts List 2026-27

22 Jan 2026

NHS healthcare providers are required to publish an annual Quality Account report about the quality of their services. The NHS England Quality Accounts List comprises National Clinical Audits, Clinical Outcome Review Programmes and other national quality improvement programmes which NHS England advises Trusts to prioritise for participation and inclusion in their Quality Accounts.

The NHS England Quality Accounts List 2026-27, plus further information and guidance can be found on our website.

Tender: National Neonatal Audit

15 Jan 2026

Applications closing date: 23 Feb 2026 (deadline extended). 

HQIP is seeking to commission the delivery of the National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP).

The contract will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, Wales, Scotland and Isle of Man for a period of 3 years, with the potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years. The maximum total budget will be up to £1,233,000 GBP including VAT, £1,027,500 GBP excluding VAT.

Further details can be found on HQIP’s tenders webpage.

When Every Day Matters

12 Jan 2026

HQIP Audit Drives Earlier Lung Cancer Diagnosis.

Lung cancer is one of the most significant challenges facing the NHS, representing the leading cause of cancer death in the UK. But HQIP-commissioned data released in 2025 highlights a particularly encouraging trend of lives being extended and saved: a sustained increase in the proportion of patients diagnosed at stage 1 or stage 2, when the disease is most amenable to curative treatment.

Over the past decade, the National Lung Cancer Audit (NLCA), which is commissioned by HQIP and part of the National Cancer Audit Collaborating Centre (NATCAN), has played a pivotal role in driving improvements in lung cancer diagnosis and survival. Its 2025 State of the Nation report is an audit of the NHS care received by people diagnosed with lung cancer in England and Wales during 2023. Importantly, we have seen a 7-percentage point increase in England in people diagnosed with stage 1 or 2 in 2023 (37%, up from 30% in 2021). In Wales, there’s even greater improvement, with a 10-percentage point increase (up to 34%, from 24% in 2021).

Early-stage diagnosis is fundamental to improving survival. Historically, most lung cancer cases were identified at advanced stages, limiting treatment options. Through systematic audit, benchmarking, and recommendations, identifying unwarranted variation, and providing actionable insights, the NLCA is helping to shift this pattern.

This improvement in early diagnosis aligns directly with UK healthcare priorities. The NHS 10-year plan, which highlighted that cancer outcomes in England lag behind other countries, aspires to shift the NHS from a service primarily focused on sickness to one that prioritises prevention and early diagnosis. HQIP-commissioned NATCAN, part of the Clinical Effectiveness Unit in London (a collaboration between the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine), has a crucial role to play here. The national centre of excellence has brought all NHS national cancer audits together under one umbrella and is shining a spotlight on the care and treatment of patients who are diagnosed with cancer in England and Wales.

Treatment and waiting times: A mixed picture

Even with earlier diagnosis, improved patient outcomes depend heavily on timely and effective treatment. And here the picture is mixed.

People with stage 1 or 2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in addition to a good performance status (0-2) are candidates for treatments with curative intent. The proportion of this group who had curative treatment was 80% across the whole of England in 2023, meeting the expected standard set by the audit. The proportion of people with NSCLC who had surgery also met the audit standard and exceeded pre-pandemic levels. In England, 7,018 people had lung cancer operations in 2023, an increase from 5,865 people in 2022. The audit also shows individual results for each hospital. Through these benchmarks, it helps to reduce unwarranted variation and ensure that all patients have equitable access to potentially curative treatment.

The NLCA does, however, highlight a need for improved uptake of systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT). Clinical trials have demonstrated that SACT can transform patient outcomes for people with advanced NSCLC – extending survival, as well as improving cancer related symptoms and quality of life. In 2017, the NLCA set a standard that at of people with advanced NSCLC (stages 3B-4) and a good performance status (0-1) should receive SACT; yet the proportion who received SACT in 2023 was 62% in England. As well as being too low, this has also remained largely static in recent years

This is where clinical audits, like those in the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme commissioned by HQIP, make a real difference. By identifying areas for improvement and robustly monitoring progress against these, they help ensure that every patient gets the best possible treatment.

Lung cancer treatment waiting times also show cause for concern, particularly given that earlier diagnosis means demand is increasing. Delays in accessing treatment heighten stress and uncertainty for patients and, in some cases, allow the cancer to advance, limiting the effectiveness of potential treatments.

The National Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway for England (NOLCP) states that time from referral to the start of treatment for people with NSCLC should be no longer than . However, time to surgery exceeded 49 days for seven out of eight people with NSCLC at stage 1 or 2 in England, with a median time of 83 days. In Wales it was longer still, with the median time to surgery 97 days for these patients.

Timely diagnosis and treatment for people with Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is imperative too, as these tumours are highly aggressive, rapidly progressive, and can quickly spread, ultimately leading to fatal outcomes. In 2017, the NLCA set a standard that at least 80% of people with SCLC should receive SACT within 14 days of pathological diagnosis. The NLCA’s 2025 report highlights that in 2023, the median time from diagnosis to treatment in England was 15 days – with only 48% starting treatment within the target timeframe of 14 days.

It is in precisely situations like this that national clinical audit has an important role to play, working with the sector to provide evidence that highlights where changes would have an impact on patient outcomes. This will hopefully help deliver future treatment improvements, following the progress already made on earlier diagnosis.

Despite the mixed picture on treatment, crucially, more lives are being extended and saved. 2025’s NLCA report sees the median survival of the 18,653 patients in England diagnosed between 1 January and 30 June 2023 reach 358 days (compared to 267 days in 2021), with 50% surviving one year. While clinical audit is just one part of a healthcare system working hard to achieve improvements in care, to save and improve lives, it is an essential tool in healthcare providers’ armoury. HQIP Chief Executive, Chris Gush, explains:

Find out more

New resources published January 2026

8 Jan 2026

We are pleased to announce that the following NEW RESOURCES to support improvement in healthcare, from HQIP’s audits and programmes, are available:

Fracture Liaison Service annual report, Fracture Liaison Service Database (FLS-DB).

This report contains a number of key messages, in addition to five recommendations for improvement aimed at Integrated care boards (ICBs) and Welsh health boards. It also highlights the inequity in treatment access among FLSs, and encourages services to review their local pathways for high fracture risk patients, and utilise NHS-recommended quality improvement (QI) tools.

Further data

In addition, we are pleased to share that the following data is also available:

  • Vascular careNational Vascular Registry (NVR). Latest data release 2025
  • Mental healthNational Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH). Latest quarterly data
  • MaternityMaternal, Newborn and Infant Outcome Review Programme (MBRRACE-UK). Maternal mortality surveillance data
  • StrokeSentinel Stroke National Audit Programme (SSNAP). Latest quarterly data
  • CancerNational Cancer Audit Collaborating Centre (NATCAN). Latest quarterly data on:
    – Bowel cancer
    – Kidney cancer
    – Metastatic breast cancer
    – Non-Hodgkin lymphoma
    – Lung cancer
    – Oesophagogastric cancer
    – Ovarian cancer
    – Pancreatic cancer
    – Primary breast cancer
    – Prostate cancer

All reports: All HQIP-commissioned reports can be accessed via our dedicated reports webpage.

Stay up to date: Join our mailing list to receive notifications when new reports are published.

Leadership vacancy: Director of Operations, NJR

23 Dec 2025

Following the news of the retirement of Elaine Young, Director of Operations at The National Joint Registry (NJR), we are seeking an outstanding leader to oversee the operational delivery and strategic development of the NJR, which is hosted by HQIP.

This is a rare opportunity to lead one of the UK’s most important national programmes for patient safety and healthcare improvement. The National Joint Registry (NJR) is internationally recognised, and holds around 4.5 million joint replacement records, making it the largest registry of its kind in the world and an exemplar of an implantable medical device registry. Its insights improve care, strengthen clinical decision-making, support rapid learning, and help patients and clinicians to choose the right treatment with confidence.

The successful candidate will lead the NJR’s day to day delivery and performance. They will lead operational delivery, financial management and commercial performance, and will oversee a high-performing directorate that delivers through strategic delivery partners. They will also be a senior ambassador for the Registry, building trusted relationships across the NHS, independent sector, professional bodies, regulators, and patient and public stakeholders. Above all, they will ensure that NJR outputs are credible, usable, and acted upon.

Closing date: 31 January 2026.

Find out more and how to apply

Tender: Seizures and Epilepsies in Children and Young People

22 Dec 2025

Applications closing date: 20 Feb 2026 (deadline extended).

HQIP is seeking to commission the delivery of the Seizures and Epilepsies in Children and Young People Audit.

The contract will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, Wales, and publicly funded care in Jersey for a period of 3 years. There is potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years.

Further details can be found on HQIP’s tenders webpage.

Latest news: December 2025 eBulletin

18 Dec 2025

The December edition of HQIP’s eBulletin is out now! It features the latest news and updates relating to clinical audit, outcome reviews and data-informed healthcare improvement, including: What’s new?
  • BMJ Leader article: Why clinical audit is key to improvement and efficiency in healthcare
  • #CAAW25 case study on engaging patients to improve mental health services
  • Lived experience shapes our new National Audit of Eating Disorders
  • HQIP Trustees’ Report and Accounts 2024-25

A chance to revisit:

  • Latest reports
  • Updated guide to managing ethical issues in quality improvement and clinical audit projects
In other news:
  • Jersey joins the National Joint Registry
  • HQIP Project Manager vacancy
Read HQIP’s latest eBulletin here.
Don’t forget to sign up: Keep up to date with our latest news, events and work programmes by subscribing to our mailing list today. You can also follow us on: LinkedIn and X: @HQIP

Each Data Point Represents a Person and Their Family

15 Dec 2025

How lived experience is shaping HQIP’s new National Audit of Eating Disorders. 

It’s estimated that at least 1.25 million people in the UK live with an eating disorder. Behind every statistic is a person whose daily life, and the lives of those who love them, is profoundly affected. The emotional and physical pain impacts patients, families, partners, and friends alike. Eating disorders can also be life-threatening: Anorexia Nervosa has the highest mortality rate of any mental health disorder, underscoring the urgent need for better care and support.

The new National Audit of Eating Disorders (NAED), commissioned by HQIP and delivered by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, aims to improve identification, management, and overall quality of care for people with eating disorders. In its first year, the audit has mapped services across England to understand the breadth and depth of current care, achieving an outstanding 97% participation rate from eligible teams and publishing a Service Mapping report that outlines what has been discovered.

Crucially, the audit has placed the voices of people with lived experience at the very centre of its work, ensuring that those who use eating disorder services, and those who care for them, directly shape how data is gathered, analysed, and shared. HQIP champions patient and public involvement in all national audits within the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme (NCAPOP) to ensure that improvement is not just theoretical, but grounded in the realities of those who are in need of care. Their perspectives ensure that recommendations become changes that make a difference to patients and their families, and save lives.

True co-production in action

Lived experience is never an add-on; it is a key foundation of the NAED team’s work. The principle that each data point represents a person and their family underpins the entire project.

By combining clinical expertise with lived experience insight, and supported by HQIP’s expertise in patient involvement, quality and governance, the audit aims to enhance the identification, management, and quality of care for people of all ages with eating disorders. This inclusive approach ensures that future service improvements will be guided by the realities of people’s lives, and help to translate data into meaningful, person-centred actions that can improve outcomes and save lives.

Alongside representatives from many partner organisations, two Lived Experience Advisors sit on NAED’s Implementation and Steering groups. These groups provide the project team with expertise from multiple backgrounds to plan, structure, produce, and interpret the results of the audit fully and without bias. Importantly, the Lived Experience Advisors ensure that the perspectives of people with direct experience of eating disorders are consistently heard and acted upon in every key decision.

This commitment to patient engagement is applied to all aspects of the audit’s work. Service users who are under the age of 16 are being asked what’s important to them via a survey, and the audit also has a dedicated Service User and Carer Advisory Group (SUCAG), which brings together a diverse range of people with personal or caring experience of eating disorders. Co-facilitated with the charity Beat, the SUCAG works alongside the Steering Group, as well as clinicians, researchers, and HQIP representatives who provide oversight, guidance, and ensure that patient input is meaningfully integrated throughout the audit process. The SUCAG helps shape the direction of the audit, set its metrics and ensure that it reflects issues that matter most to patients and families.

The SUCAG’s input goes far beyond consultation too. Members reviewed the clarity and accessibility of the Service Mapping report and a forthcoming data dashboard to ensure they are inclusive and genuinely useful. Their feedback even informed how findings were presented, including designing posters for eating disorder service waiting rooms with QR codes linking directly to the national report to make the results accessible to patients and their families.

What the data reveals

Exceptional engagement, successfully mapping 297 eating disorder teams across 209 service providers in England, has resulted in the most detailed national picture of eating disorder service provision to date. Still only one year in from inception, this work lays the groundwork for future audit phases and offers new insights into both strengths and challenges, from access and staffing to treatment availability and waiting times.

The audit found high levels of multidisciplinary working and strong uptake of NICE-recommended therapies, reflecting good practice across many teams. However, it also revealed significant variation in access, service configuration, and waiting times across regions and age groups.

  • Waiting times ranged widely. The median wait for assessment for children and young people (CYP) is 14 days, compared to 28 days for adults. CYP typically wait 4 days for treatment, whereas for adults this median wait is 42 days – and some teams report waits of up to 700 days.
  • Diagnostic coverage varied. While over 90% of teams treat Anorexia Nervosa, only 60% of adult teams and 66% of CYP teams treat Binge Eating Disorder (BED), and fewer than half currently treat Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) – 29% of adult and 45% of CYP teams.
  • Workforce pressures and variation in adult versus CYP service capacity were also highlighted, with adult teams managing 89% higher patient demand than CYP teams.

These findings offer vital insight into areas requiring targeted improvement and provide a benchmark for tracking progress in the next phase of the audit.

Looking ahead

The service mapping undertaken by the NAED lays the foundation for the core audit phase beginning in 2026, which will assess services against 12 national metrics. For HQIP, as we have seen with other audits as they mature, we are confident that this will be a milestone in informing changes that will lead to improved care and patient outcomes. As such, the NAED – with its patient-focused approach – will play a key role in demonstrating the continued value of national audit in strengthening quality assurance, accountability, and patient partnership across healthcare.

Find out more

New resources published December 2025

11 Dec 2025

We are pleased to announce that the following NEW RESOURCES to support improvement in healthcare, from HQIP’s audits, registries and programmes, have been published:

  • Cardiovascular disease prevention: Annual audit report 2025, CVDPREVENT. Contains key findings relating to hypertension, cholesterol, and chronic kidney disease.
  • Eating disorders: Service Mapping Report 2025, National Audit of Eating Disorders (NAED). In its first year, the audit focused on mapping services to understand the breadth and depth of current provision.
  • Emergency paediatric surgery: Right Place, Right Time, Right Team, Child Health Clinical Outcome Review (NCEPOD). Reviews the quality of care provided to children needing emergency surgery.
  • Paediatric critical care: Summary report 2025, Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet). Describes key metrics and outcomes related to transport and admission events in order to monitor the delivery and quality of care against agreed standards, and evaluate clinical outcomes, to inform national policy in paediatric critical care.

All reports: All HQIP-commissioned reports can be accessed via our dedicated reports webpage. Stay up to date: Join our mailing list to receive notifications when new reports are published.