Leading multi-disciplinary teams towards consensus

Summary

The team at HQIP is highly skilled at convening groups of multi-professional experts across fields and disciplines to work through challenges and arrive at consensus decisions that lead to improved patient care.

We were commissioned by the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) to facilitate discussions amongst experts on how to develop a single data solution that could capture data and eventually report outcomes on surgical mesh implant procedures. Urogynaecological surgical mesh is used to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Background to the project

In February 2018, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care announced a review into how the health system responds to reports from patients about harmful side effects from medicines and medical devices, including surgical mesh. The review, Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review (IMMDSR), is chaired by Baroness Julia Cumberlege CBE DL.

After considering an early recommendation from the IMMDSR in July 2018, DHSC instigated a pause in the use of surgical mesh.

There are three current sources of data maintained by three professional medical societies, and a feasibility study was commissioned by DHSC to explore whether they could be used to establish an interim data solution to meet the national pause recommendations.

The HQIP approach

In September 2018 we were commissioned by the DHSC to undertake the feasibility study.

We were tasked with exploring the current sources of mesh, SUI or POP data maintained by three professional societies- the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS), the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and the Pelvic Floor Society (TPFS) – and whether these current data collections could address the recommendations from the Baroness Cumberlege review as an interim measure before a full clinical national registry could be established.

We delivered the project via a series of technical and stakeholder workshops involving experts from the professional societies and across the healthcare system as well as patients and charities. The aims of the work were to:

  • explore the current sources of available data for SUI and POP procedures involving surgical mesh
  • discuss the recommendations of the Independent Medicine and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS)
  • review and agree the requirements of an interim database(s) to meet those recommendations
  • discuss the data and reporting requirements of an interim database(s)
  • agree the scope of the interim database(s) and explore a minimum mesh dataset for collection
  • outline the practicalities and explore the possible solutions to develop a feasible outcome data collection solution
  • consider the longer term requirements of a SUI and POP registry
  • listen to views about patient outcomes and agree what is important for women
  • undertake an option appraisal of the potential models available and develop recommendations of modifications required to existing data sources to achieve an interim database solution to meet requirements

What the team found

We published a feasibility report in July 2019 (available to download here).

We made 10 recommendations for the establishment of an interim database, including:

  • establishment of an oversight governance group
  • scope (geographical and clinical), inclusion criteria and rationalised minimum dataset
  • participation requirements
  • data flows and linkage to other national datasets
  • information governance requirements

Other recommendations focus on aims and objectives, data quality, patient outcome measures and outputs.

We also proposed that further patient engagement is required during the establishment of an interim database to ensure the information collected is appropriate and takes important patient outcomes into consideration; this should include wide representation from patient groups.

Impact of the work

We presented the results to DHSC for consideration of the preferred model to be used to establish an interim database, and implementation of recommendations to establish an interim database. DHSC is expected to publish next steps in due course.

Case studies

Service Reconfiguration case study

Clinical service reconfiguration for an NHS Trust undergoing merger

A partnership of three NHS Trusts approached HQIP to act as a 'critical friend' to check and challenge their thinking in the implementation of a major reconfiguration of vascular services.

Read more »

National Clinical Audit induction

HQIP offer full induction days for individuals or groups on the national clinical audit and patient outcomes programme (NCAPOP).

Read more »

Who we work with

Don’t miss out. Sign up to be notified when this resource is updated and to receive updates about other related quality improvement resources, events and news from HQIP.

By continuing you agree to receive emails with updates and other information from HQIP and you are confirming you are over the age of 13.

Please read our privacy policy to understand how HQIP uses the information you provide, your use of HQIP’s website and your interaction with the marketing emails to improve the relevance of the communications we send you. You can unsubscribe at any time.

I have read and agree with the contents of the privacy policy.

Close