Traditionally, the distinction between research and clinical audit has been used as the basis for deciding if an activity that involves data collection about patient care needs ethical oversight. Ethical issues related to clinical audit and quality improvement activities have often not been recognized or acted on properly. This extensive review and analysis of the literature on ethics and clinical audit and quality improvement demonstrates the range of ethics issues related to quality improvement activities carried out in healthcare organisations. The review concludes that it is no longer appropriate to use the distinction between research and clinical audit as the basis for deciding if ethics review is needed for a proposed activity.
Questions to be used to screen proposals, findings, and the effectiveness of actions taken for clinical audits and quality improvement projects for ethical oversight purposes are set out in the review. Structures and mechanisms used in healthcare organisations to provide ethical oversight of clinical audit and quality improvement programmes are also summarised in the review.
The guide explains the importance of ethical oversight of clinical audit and quality improvement programmes in NHS organisations and gives practical guidance on the subject. It includes:
The template is the suggested text for a policy on the subject of clinical audit and ethics with guidance on how to use the document in an NHS organisation. The template includes the following subjects:
Please note that, in order to protect the environment, HQIP resources have been designed to be printed in duplex, ie double-sided. If you choose to print single-sided, blank pages will appear within the document. Furthermore, HQIP tools and templates are designed using Microsoft Office packages and may lose formatting should they be opened in other formats.